Authority map
A plain-language map of identities, credentials, tools, write actions, approvals, and revocation boundaries.
New defensive service
AI Agent Security Review
A manual architecture and control review for teams giving AI agents access to tools, data, browsers, code, workflows, or other agents.
Best for
A scoped defensive decision, not a black-box verdict
Developers preparing an agent for production access.
Teams adding browser, shell, code, messaging, or write-capable tools.
Multi-agent systems with planners, managers, specialists, or shared memory.
Organizations that need an approval, logging, and incident-response control map.
What the review produces
Evidence you can act on
Untrusted-input review
A review of how webpages, files, retrieved documents, user content, and tool output can influence agent actions.
Multi-agent control review
Scope and evidence checks for delegation, specialist permissions, shared memory, and manager decisions.
Action-risk register
Prioritized high-impact actions, likely failure modes, existing controls, and unresolved evidence.
Remediation sequence
A short list of changes ordered by authority, exposure, reversibility, and operational impact.
Verification checklist
Evidence to collect before rollout, including test cases, logs, approval records, pause controls, and recovery steps.
Review flow
A short, bounded process
- 1.Complete the free checklist and describe the intended agent workflow.
- 2.Share a sanitized architecture overview, tool inventory, and approval boundaries.
- 3.CheckLink reviews the design defensively and identifies missing evidence or controls.
- 4.You receive a scoped findings summary and prioritized next steps; implementation remains with your team.
Safety and scope boundaries
What this service does not do
No exploit development, payload creation, unauthorized testing, or instructions for attacking third-party systems.
No passwords, private keys, customer data, production secrets, or unrestricted production credentials should be submitted.
The review does not certify that an agent is secure and does not replace a formal penetration test, legal review, or internal security approval.
Testing, if later agreed, must be separately scoped to systems the requester owns or is explicitly authorized to assess.
Manual intake
Request the review
Describe the system and the decision you need to make. Do not submit passwords, private keys, exploit code, customer data, or confidential logs. CheckLink will review the request manually and reply if the scope is a fit.
Start privately before sharing architecture details
Use the free client-side tool to organize the first conversation.